|
1
|
- Dr. G. Jacomen
- AZ St Maarten Duffel
|
|
2
|
- Flanders 1997-1999: 670 new cases/year
- 5,3 % of all malignancies in women
- third after breast (34%) and colorectum (13%)
- Increase !!
- 2000-2001: 761 new cases/year
|
|
3
|
- Endometrioid adenoCa
Special types: Villoglandular
Secretory
- Ciliated cell
- With squamous differentiation
- Mucinous Ca
- Serous Ca
- Clear cell Ca
- Mixed cell adenoCa
- Squamous cell Ca
- Transitional cell Ca
- Small cell Ca
- Undifferentiated Ca
- Others
|
|
4
|
- Glands resembling those of normal endometrium in proliferative phase
- Max 10% zones with squamous, serous, clear cell, mucinous
differentiation
- If >10% : mixed type
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
- Mostly based on architectural grade
- Nuclei only important if grade 3
|
|
7
|
- Depends on the extent of solid zones in comparion to the glands
- Do not consider squamous zones !!
|
|
8
|
- Grade1: Max 5 % solid
- Grade 2: 6-50 % solid
- Grade 3: > 50 % solid
|
|
9
|
- Nuclei grade 1:
- oval
- slightly enlarged
- fine dispersed chromatin
- Nuclei grade 3:
- strongly pleomorphic
- strongly enlarged
- unregular coarse chromatin
- prominent eosinophilic nucleoli
|
|
10
|
- Nuclei grade 2: between 1 and 3
- Number of mitosis not important
|
|
11
|
- Architectural grade primordial
- Cytologic grade 3 augments architecturale grade 1 or 2 by 1
- If really discordant: think of
|
|
12
|
- Arch 1 + Cyt 1 or 2
- Arch 1 + Cyto 3
- Arch 2 + Cyt 1 or 2
- Arch 2 + Cyt 3
|
|
13
|
- 1 tumour with zones grade 1 and zones grade 3
|
|
14
|
- Heterogeneity in grade very often
- Reason for discordance between curettage and hysterectomy
- Grade 1 remains grade 1 in 45%
|
|
15
|
- Silva: Association of low-grade endometrioid Ca of the uterus and ovary
with undifferentiated Ca: a new type of dedifferentiated Ca?
I J Gynecol Pathol (2006) 25: 52-58
- Indicates aggressive behavior
- In asynchronous cases: can explain absence of second primary
|
|
16
|
- Villoglandular Ca
- Secretory Ca
- Ciliated cell Ca
- Endometrioid Ca with squamous differentiaton
|
|
17
|
- Numerous villous fronds, long and slender
- Delicate fibrovascular core
- Columnar cells , polarity maintained
- Nuclei: usual grade 1 or 2
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
- Villoglandular Ca:
- long papillae
- slender papillae
- fibrovascular connective tissue
- little atypia
- regular luminal border
- cohesive cells
- Serous Ca:
- short papillae
- broad papillae
- fibrous connective tissue
- severe atypia
- irregular luminal border: micropapillae
- dyscohesive cells
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
- Micropapillary variant of endometrioid Ca
- Short papillae, not complex
- Bland cytology
- Cells not dyscohesive
- Not an official WHO-variant
- Prognosis worse than endometrioid NOS
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
- resembling early secretory endometrium
- vacuoles in cytoplasm of most cells
sub- or supranuclear
- nuclei usual grade 1 without stratification
|
|
32
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
- Secretory Ca
- glandular
- endometrioid NOS
- cells columnar
- nuclei eccentric
- Clear Cell Ca
- often solid
- serous Ca
- cells round, polygonal
- nuclei central
- severe atypia
- frequent hobnail
|
|
35
|
|
|
36
|
- Almost always grade 1
- often cribriform pattern
- prominent eosinophil cytoplasm
- Cilia (not always) - cuticula
- Nuclear membrane irregular
- Coarse chromatin
- Prominent nucleoli
|
|
37
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
39
|
- Associated with endometrioid Ca NOS, or mucinous Ca
- Cilated cells must predominate
|
|
40
|
- = adenosquamous Ca + adenoacanthoma
- is squamous component malignant ?
- difficult to assess
- no clinical significance
|
|
41
|
- 10% of the tumour has to be squamous
- Sometimes only intraluminal
- Glandular component predominates
|
|
42
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
44
|
- Prognosis does not depend on assessment of malignancy of squamous
zones
Architectural grade of glandular component
- Identify squamous zones and IGNORE them while grading
|
|
45
|
|
|
46
|
- Solid zones of undifferentiated cells: regard as glandular unless:
- Intercellular bridges
- Large cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm and clear cellboundaries
|
|
47
|
|
|
48
|
- Atypical hyperplasia with metaplasia/EIN
- Granuloma
- High-grade non-squamous component !!!
- Primary Cx:
- Signet cells: rather in Cx
|
|
49
|
- Remains glandular and squamous
- 20% only glandular component
- 8% only squamous component
|
|
50
|
- If keratin without viable tumourcells: ignore while staging
- Consider only as tumour if also viable tumourcells are present !!!
|
|
51
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
53
|
- Very rare in Em: no official variant
- More frequent in cervix
- Considered to be an undifferentiated adenosquamous Ca
- Very aggressive
|
|
54
|
- Polygonal cells in solid sheets
- “glassy” cytoplasm
- Fibrous stroma
- Abundant inflammatory cells
- In Cx: eosinophils !!
|
|
55
|
- Endometrioid adenoCa
- Mucinous Ca
- Serous Ca
- Clear cell Ca
Undifferentiated Ca
- Mixed cell adenoCa
- Squamous cell Ca
- Transitional cell Ca
- Small cell Ca
- Others
|
|
56
|
- Rare in pure form
- Looks like mucinous Ca of endocx
- 50 % of cells : PAS+ mucin in cytoplasm
- diastasis resistent
|
|
57
|
- (villo)glandular pattern
- uniform columnar cells
- HE: granular, not clear !
- dilated glands with mucin and leukocytes
|
|
58
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
61
|
- Few mitoses
- mild to moderate atypia
- minimal stratification
|
|
62
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
64
|
- No rules !!!
- By convention : rules of endometrioid
- Most are grade 1
|
|
65
|
- Other types Em Ca
- MGH Cx
- Mucinous Ca Cx
|
|
66
|
- serous Ca, clear cell Ca:
- PAS: not diastasis resistent
- morphology: clear or eosinophil, not granular
- cells more polygonal, hobnail
- atypia
- secretory Ca
- clear cytoplasm
|
|
67
|
|
|
68
|
- microglandular hyperplasia cx:
- age
- less atypia, less complex
- mitoses: up to 3/1O HPF in MGH
- subnuclear vacuoles only in MGH
- subcolumnar squamous metaplasia: MGH
- Vim - in MGH, + in 90% of MGC
|
|
69
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
72
|
- Foam cells
- Squamous component
- Mucinous component
- Endometrioid
|
|
73
|
- Not only in carcinoma
- If in carcinoma:
rather Em than Ecx
|
|
74
|
- Benign squamous component: EM
- Extensive squamous component: EM
- Luminal squamous component: EM
|
|
75
|
- Endocx: more atypia
- hyperchromatic nuclei
- more mitoses and apoptosis
- coarse chromatine
- Look for associated CIN or EGD
|
|
76
|
- Endometrioid Ca of endocx is NOT recognised by most authors
- Considered to be “Mucinous Ca with little or no mucin”
- Endometrioid features do NOT help
|
|
77
|
- McCluggage: A panel of immunohistochemical stains, including CEA, Vim
and ER, aids in the distinction between primary endometrial and
endocervical adenoCa
Int J Gynecol Pathol 2002; 21: 11-15
- Kamoi: Immunohistochemical staining in the distinction between primary
endometrial and endocervical adenoCa: another viewpoint
Int J Gynecol Pathol 2002; 21: 217-223
|
|
78
|
- Primary Em
- ER +
- Vim +
- CEA -
- P16 -
- Primary endocx
- ER -
- Vim -
- CEA +
- P16 +
|
|
79
|
|
|
80
|
- Dabbs: Intermediate filaments in endometrial and endocervical
carcinomas. The diagnostic utility of vimentin patterns.
Am J Surg Path 1986; 10: 568-576
- Endometrial Ca +, Ecx -
- Not completely specific
|
|
81
|
- Cohen: Endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinoma: an immunoperoxidase
and histochemical study.
Am J Surg Pathol 1982; 6:151-157
- Often present in Ecx Ca, not in Em Ca
- Not completely specific
|
|
82
|
- Mc Cluggage: p16 may assist in distinction between endometrial and
endocx adenoca
I J Gynecol Pathol 2003, 22:
231-235
- Ecx: 22/23 diffusely +
- Em: most are + but focal (sometimes
100 % +)
|
|
83
|
- Endometrioid Ca
- Villoglandular
- Secretory
- Ciliated cell
- With squamous differentiation
- Mucinous Ca
|